PATRICK S. BEDARD — AUGUST 28, 2026 PUBLIC SOURCE EXCERPTS Publisher: JTforME / Justin A. Tahai Website edition: August 28, 2026 This is an editorial transcription and source guide, not a certified court record. Bracketed omissions are editorial. Personal email addresses, access tokens, provider location, minor-child identifiers, signatures and unrelated client communications are not reproduced. Original correspondence remains in the author's private archive. A transmitted allegation is not, by itself, proof that the alleged event happened. Contrary positions are retained. S1. TYLER SERVICE NOTIFICATION — AUGUST 28, 2026 Envelope: 269618 Source category: automated service notice / transmission metadata Filed by: Patrick Bedard Case: BIDDC-PA-2024-01285 Filing type: Responsive pleading - OBJECTION/OPPOSITION - filed Displayed submission field: 8/28/2026 10:42 AM EST Gmail message timestamp: 2026-08-28T14:43:24 (UTC) Received-header timestamp: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 07:43:24 -0700 (PDT) Converted local Eastern time: 10:43:24 a.m. EDT The service-document access URL and personal service addresses are omitted. Time-zone note: the automated notice prints "EST" in August. This guide preserves that field exactly but uses the native received-header offset for the delivery calculation. From 10:43:24 a.m. to the scheduled 11:00 a.m. session is 16 minutes and 36 seconds. The 10:42 displayed submission time precedes 11:00 by 18 displayed minutes. This proves the notice's metadata, not who selected the minute or any clinical effect. S2. APPOINTMENT REMINDER FORWARDED — AUGUST 26, 2026 Source category: sent forwarding email and provider-generated reminder From: Justin A. Tahai To: Amanda Morse Cc: Patrick S. Bedard Sent timestamp: 2026-08-26T15:18:06 (UTC), or 11:18:06 a.m. Eastern Subject: Fwd: Appointment reminder for Friday, August 28th Provider reminder excerpt: "This is a reminder that you have an appointment with Daniel Pierce, LCSW, LADC at 11:00 am (ET) on Friday, August 28th." Personal addresses, calendar links/tokens, provider address/phone, and unrelated signature omitted. This establishes transmission of the appointment notice, not proof that every recipient opened it. S3. AUGUST 28 OBJECTION Source category: opposing party's signed submission; not a court ruling Title: Amanda Morse's Objection to Justin Tahai's Motion for Sanctions Author/signatory: Patrick S. Bedard, as counsel for Amanda Morse Date: August 28, 2026 The objection calls the sanctions request "yet another baseless filing" and says that Mr. Tahai offers no support for sanctions. It incorporates the prior motion for sanctions in the form of an injunction and a "soon to be filed Reply" to Mr. Tahai's objection. The two-page objection itself does not state an emergency or an expiring deadline. That observation does not establish that no external deadline or practical reason existed. A public reading copy with the minor child's name removed is published alongside this guide. The underlying original and incorporated filings control over this summary. S4. JUNE 27, 2025 COUNSEL-TO-COUNSEL EXCHANGE Source category: counsel's factual assertions and opposing counsel's response The exchange was forwarded by Amanda Ramirez to Justin Tahai at 1:20:08 p.m. Eastern. No confidential attorney-client analysis is reproduced below. Amanda E. Ramirez to Patrick S. Bedard — June 27, 2025, 12:38 p.m. Subject: Tahai "My client is having trouble with getting your client's cooperation with the counseling. Ahe is not timely responding to messages, so opportunities are being lost. She is also refusing to utilize Mondays, which she previously agreed could be an option. Furthermore, she has begun communication chains, excluding Justin, resulting in her canceling appointments without Justin's knowledge. We would appreciate your efforts to get your client to meaningfully engage in this process. It is important for [child's name omitted] and needs to be taken much more seriously than she is taking it. My client has asked that I file for remedial action, but I thought it best to reach out to you in a first effort." Editorial note: "Ahe" is preserved as written. Signatures/contact details omitted. Patrick S. Bedard to Amanda E. Ramirez — June 27, 2025, 12:52 p.m. Subject: Re: Tahai "Amanda Morse provided me with the following response to your e-mail. Justin asked her if they could start doing 2 sessions a week and Amanda told him this month she can't because she has had other appointments on Mondays. Justin scheduled Monday appointments without asking Amanda first. Amanda has kept to the every Friday appointment aside from one that she gave over 48 hours notice about having to reschedule. Two appointments a week are hard with work, needing to find a sitter for Amanda's youngest and the 45 minute drive to and from the appointments. Let me know if other than one Friday appointment whether there have been other missed Friday appointments. One a week is all I expected and I don't think the Court would expect more than once a week." Editorial note: apostrophe typography and line wrapping normalized; substance preserved. RELATED NATIVE-EMAIL TIMING CHECK Amanda Morse to the provider, with Justin Tahai copied — June 11, 2025, 9:08:12 p.m. Eastern. Subject: June 13 appointment at 1:00 p.m. [minor name omitted]. Summary: Morse wrote that she had just become aware of a scheduling conflict and asked whether another Friday time was available. Scheduled appointment: Friday, June 13, 2025, 1:00 p.m. Eastern. Located written-notice interval: 39 hours, 51 minutes, 48 seconds. Difference from 48 hours: 8 hours, 8 minutes, 12 seconds short. Limit: No earlier written notice was located in the retained Gmail account. An earlier oral notice or a message outside that account cannot be ruled out. This exchange establishes that counsel raised and answered the concerns. The native timestamp directly checks the later “over 48 hours” assertion and does not support it in the located written record. It does not independently determine every other scheduling fact, whether an order was violated, or motive. S5. AUGUST 28 WITNESS-RELATED SUPPLEMENT — SUBMISSION RECEIPTS Source category: automated filing-submission notices, not acceptance or merits rulings YORDC-FM-2010-00190: Envelope 270104, displayed submission 8/28/2026 7:14 PM EST. BIDDC-PA-2024-01285: Envelope 270105, displayed submission 8/28/2026 7:19 PM EST. Both identify a two-page lead file: Motion_for_Leave_and_Supplemental_Addendum_Ramirez_Witness_SIGNED_20260828.pdf The filing identifies Ramirez as a potential fact and authentication witness. It does not establish that she agreed to testify, that her testimony will be admitted, that privilege has been resolved, or that the requested relief has been granted. S6. PUBLISHED FIRM WORDING Source category: official firm marketing; verified August 28, 2026 Law Office of Patrick S. Bedard, P.C. / "Why Choose Our Firm" https://www.patbedardlawoffice.com/why-choose-us/ Short quoted phrase: "the most aggressive representation" This is marketing language, not an admission of misconduct or intent. PUBLICATION BOUNDARY The author is an opposing litigant, not a former client reviewing legal services. Complaints, submissions, proposed orders, party assertions and opinions are not findings. Corrections and a substantive response may be submitted through JTforME's correction channel.